<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ITT Minute  &#8211; VMWare Server Backup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevindevin.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevindevin.com/?p=2468</link>
	<description>MY Blog, MY Interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cd-MaN</title>
		<link>http://kevindevin.com/?p=2468&#038;cpage=1#comment-22683</link>
		<dc:creator>Cd-MaN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevindevin.com/?p=2468#comment-22683</guid>
		<description>This is only an idea, but I think that this way of backup is unsafe! My reasoning is as follows: because there is no direct interaction between VMWare and the OS / Backup software (something like telling it: flush a consistent state to disk), you can&#039;t guarantee that the image you back up will be in a consistent state. Ie. you will be able to get a back-up, only that you might have problems using it later.

BTW. the new theme looks great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only an idea, but I think that this way of backup is unsafe! My reasoning is as follows: because there is no direct interaction between VMWare and the OS / Backup software (something like telling it: flush a consistent state to disk), you can&#8217;t guarantee that the image you back up will be in a consistent state. Ie. you will be able to get a back-up, only that you might have problems using it later.</p>
<p>BTW. the new theme looks great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
